Lensing Corrections to Features in the Angular Two-Point Correlation Function and Power Spectrum
Marilena LoVerde, Lam Hui, Enrique Gaztanaga

TL;DR
This paper studies how gravitational lensing magnification bias distorts the observed galaxy correlation function and power spectrum, especially affecting features like the matter-radiation equality peak and baryon wiggles, with implications for precision cosmology.
Contribution
It provides a detailed quantification of lensing-induced distortions in the angular correlation function and power spectrum, highlighting their dependence on redshift, galaxy bias, and source distribution.
Findings
Lensing corrections increase with redshift and are larger for steep number count slopes.
Significant shifts in the matter-radiation equality scale occur at z > 1.5, reaching up to 30%.
Baryon wiggles are shifted by less than 1%, with width increases around 10%.
Abstract
It is well known that magnification bias, the modulation of galaxy or quasar source counts by gravitational lensing, can change the observed angular correlation function. We investigate magnification-induced changes to the shape of the observed correlation function w(\theta) and the angular power spectrum C_{\ell}, paying special attention to the matter-radiation equality peak and the baryon wiggles. Lensing mixes the correlation function of the source galaxies with the matter correlation at the lower redshifts of the lenses. Since the lenses probe structure nearer to the observer, the angular scale dependence of the lensing terms is different from that of the sources, thus the observed correlation function is distorted. We quantify how the lensing corrections depend on the width of the selection function, the galaxy bias b, and the number count slope s. The correction increases with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
