
TL;DR
This paper shows that current low redshift observations suggesting w=-1 do not necessarily confirm a cosmological constant, emphasizing the need for experiments sensitive to the time variation of dark energy's equation of state.
Contribution
It clarifies the limitations of low redshift data in distinguishing a true cosmological constant from dynamic dark energy models and discusses parametrization issues of w(z).
Findings
Low redshift data nearly automatically yield w=-1 in a cosmological constant universe.
Standard parametrization w(z)=w_0+w_a z/(1+z) is robust.
High order polynomial parametrizations can be problematic.
Abstract
We demonstrate that cosmic microwave background observations consistent with a cosmological constant universe predict in a well-defined sense that lower redshift measures will nearly automatically deliver w=-1 for the dark energy equation of state value unless they are sensitive to w(z). Thus low redshift data pointing to w=-1 does not truly argue for a cosmological constant. Even the simplest question of whether the equation of state of dark energy is equal to the cosmological constant therefore requires experiments able to sensitively constrain time variation w(z) and not merely a constant w. We also note a number of issues regarding parametrization of w(z), demonstrating that the standard form w(z)=w_0+w_a z/(1+z) is robust but use of high order polynomials and cutting off the high redshift behavior can be pathological.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms
