A signed analog of Euler's reduction formula for the double zeta function
David M. Bradley

TL;DR
This paper introduces an elementary proof for a signed analog of Euler's reduction formula for the double zeta function, extending Euler's classical results to include sign variations, with implications for evaluating these functions.
Contribution
It provides a new elementary proof of a signed reduction formula for the double zeta function, generalizing Euler's original evaluation to include sign variations.
Findings
Elementary proof of the signed reduction formula
Extension of Euler's evaluation to signed double zeta functions
Connection to previous contour integration proofs
Abstract
The double zeta function is a function of two arguments defined by a double Dirichlet series, and was first studied by Euler in response to a letter from Goldbach in 1742. By calculating many examples, Euler inferred a closed form evaluation of the double zeta function in terms of values of the Riemann zeta function, in the case when the two arguments are positive integers with opposite parity. Here, we consider a signed analog of Euler's evaluation: namely a reduction formula for the signed double zeta function that reduces to Euler's evaluation when the signs are specialized to 1. This formula was first stated in a 1997 paper by Borwein, Bradley and Broadhurst and was subsequently proved by Flajolet and Salvy using contour integration. The purpose here is to give an elementary proof based on a partial fraction identity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Mathematical Identities · Analytic Number Theory Research · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
