Reaffirming the connection between the Galactic stellar warp and the Canis Major overdensity
M. L\'opez-Corredoira (1), Y. Momany (2), S. Zaggia (2), A., Cabrera-Lavers (1,3) ((1) IAC, (2) INAF-OA Padova, (3) GTC Project Office)

TL;DR
This paper re-analyzes the Canis Major overdensity, demonstrating it can be explained by the Galactic warp without invoking a disrupting dwarf galaxy or new substructure, challenging previous interpretations.
Contribution
It provides a critical re-evaluation showing the CMa overdensity is consistent with the Galactic warp, refuting claims of a separate accreting dwarf galaxy.
Findings
The warp explains the observed stellar overdensity in CMa.
Color-magnitude diagrams are consistent with normal Galactic populations.
No need to invoke new substructures or dwarf galaxy accretion.
Abstract
We perform a critical re-analysis and discussion of recent results presented in the literature which interpret the CMa overdensity as the signature of an accreting dwarf galaxy or a new substructure within the Galaxy. Several issues are addressed. We show that arguments against the ``warp'' interpretation are based on an erroneous perception of the Milky Way. There is nothing anomalous with colour--magnitude diagrams on opposite sides of the average warp mid-plane being different. We witnessed the rise and fall of the blue plume population, first attributed to young stars in a disrupting dwarf galaxy and now discarded as a normal disc population. Similarly, there is nothing anomalous in the outer thin+thick disc metallicities being low (-1<[Fe/H]<-0.5), and spiral arms (as part of the thin disc) should, and do, warp. Most importantly, we show unambiguously that, contrary to previous…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
