Structure and randomness in combinatorics
Terence Tao

TL;DR
This paper discusses a decomposition approach in combinatorics that separates large objects into structured, pseudo-random, and small components, highlighting the dominance of the structured part in many cases.
Contribution
It illustrates the decomposition methodology in combinatorics, emphasizing the importance of structured components over pseudo-random parts in various models.
Findings
Decomposition into structured, pseudo-random, and small parts is effective.
Structured components often dominate in combinatorial models.
The approach aids in understanding complex combinatorial objects.
Abstract
Combinatorics, like computer science, often has to deal with large objects of unspecified (or unusable) structure. One powerful way to deal with such an arbitrary object is to decompose it into more usable components. In particular, it has proven profitable to decompose such objects into a \emph{structured} component, a \emph{pseudo-random} component, and a \emph{small} component (i.e. an error term); in many cases it is the structured component which then dominates. We illustrate this philosophy in a number of model cases.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · semigroups and automata theory · Algorithms and Data Compression
