The CO Tully-Fisher Relation and Implications for the Host Galaxies of High-Redshift Quasars
Luis C. Ho (The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of, Washington)

TL;DR
This study develops a method to use CO line widths to estimate galaxy dynamics and applies it to compare high-redshift quasar host galaxies with local relations, revealing potential evolutionary differences in black hole and bulge growth.
Contribution
The paper introduces a practical way to convert CO line widths into stellar velocity dispersions and applies it to high-redshift quasars, highlighting deviations from local black hole-bulge relations.
Findings
High-z quasars have larger black hole masses for a given stellar velocity dispersion.
CO line width at 20% peak intensity effectively recovers galaxy rotation velocity.
High-redshift quasar hosts deviate from the local M_BH-sigma relation, indicating evolutionary effects.
Abstract
The integrated line width derived from CO spectroscopy provides a powerful tool to study the internal kinematics of extragalactic objects, including quasars at high redshift, provided that the observed line width can be properly translated to more conventionally used kinematical parameters of galaxies. We show, through construction of a K-band CO Tully-Fisher relation for nearby galaxies spanning a wide range in infrared luminosity, that the CO line width measured at 20% of the peak intensity, when corrected for inclination and other effects, successfully recovers the maximum rotation velocity of the disk. The line width at 50% of the peak intensity performs much more poorly, in large part because CO lines have a wide range of profiles, which are shown to vary systematically with infrared luminosity. We present a practical prescription for converting observed CO line widths into the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
