Revised metallicity classes for low-mass stars: dwarfs (dM), subdwarfs (sdM), extreme subdwarfs (esdM), and ultra subdwarfs (usdM)
Sebastien Lepine, R. Michael Rich, and Michael M. Shara

TL;DR
This paper revises the classification system for low-mass M stars based on metallicity, introducing a new parameter and an additional ultra subdwarf class to improve accuracy and consistency.
Contribution
The authors propose a new empirical calibration and a novel classification parameter, zeta_{TiO/CaH}, to better categorize low-metallicity M stars, including the addition of the ultra subdwarf class.
Findings
Redefined metallicity classes using the zeta_{TiO/CaH} parameter.
Identified deficiencies in the previous classification boundaries.
Introduced sequences of sdM, esdM, and usdM as classification standards.
Abstract
The current classification system of M stars on the main sequence distinguishes three metallicity classes (dwarfs - dM, subdwarfs - sdM, and extreme subdwarfs - esdM). The spectroscopic definition of these classes is based on the relative strength of prominent CaH and TiO molecular absorption bands near 7000A, as quantified by three spectroscopic indices (CaH2, CaH3, and TiO5). We re-examine this classification system in light of our ongoing spectroscopic survey of stars with proper motion \mu > 0.45 "/yr, which has increased the census of spectroscopically identified metal-poor M stars to over 400 objects. Kinematic separation of disk dwarfs and halo subdwarfs suggest deficiencies in the current classification system. Observations of common proper motion doubles indicates that the current dM/sdM and sdM/esdM boundaries in the [TiO5,CaH2+CaH3] index plane do not follow iso-metallicity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
