Swift observations of high-redshift radio-loud quasars
R.M. Sambruna (1), F. Tavecchio (2), G. Ghisellini (2), D. Donato (1),, S. T. Holland (1), C. B. Markwardt (1), J. Tueller (1), R. F. Mushotzky (1), ((1) NASA/GSFC; (2) INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera)

TL;DR
This study uses Swift observations to analyze four high-redshift radio-loud quasars, revealing their X-ray spectral properties, variability, and the dominance of jet emission at high frequencies, with thermal disk emission also detected.
Contribution
First detailed Swift X-ray and UV observations of four high-redshift radio-loud quasars, characterizing their spectral properties and emission mechanisms.
Findings
Detected >5sigma in BAT 15-150 keV band for all sources.
Observed spectral curvature in XRT data, modeled by absorption or broken power law.
Jet emission dominates >~10^16 Hz, with thermal disk emission contributing at optical-UV frequencies.
Abstract
We report on Swift observations of four z>2 radio-loud quasars (0212+735, 0537-286, 0836+710, and 2149-307), classified as blazars. The sources, well-known emitters at soft-medium X-rays, were detected at >5sigma with the BAT experiment in 15-150 keV. No flux variability was detected within the XRT and BAT exposures, with the exception of 0836+710 which shows an increase of a factor 4 of the 15-150 keV flux on a timescale of one month. The 0.3-10 keV spectra are well fitted by power law models, with rather hard continua (photon indices Gamma_XRT ~1.3-1.5); similarly, the 15-150 keV spectra are described by power laws with Gamma_BAT ~1.3-1.8. The XRT data exhibit spectral curvature, which can be modeled either in terms of excess absorption along the line of sight, or a downward-curved broken power law. In the former case, if the excess N_H is at the rest-frame of the source, columns of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
