Half or full core-hole in density functional theory X-ray absorption spectrum calculations of water?
Matteo Cavalleri, Michael Odelius, Dennis Nordlund, Anders Nilsson and, Lars G.M. Pettersson

TL;DR
This study compares full and half core-hole potentials in density functional theory X-ray absorption spectrum calculations of water, finding the half core-hole approach yields better agreement with experimental data.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that using a half core-hole potential improves the accuracy of XAS modeling of water compared to the full core-hole approach.
Findings
Half core-hole potential aligns better with experimental spectra.
Full core-hole approach shows poor agreement in intensity and energies.
Half core-hole provides a good compromise between initial and final state effects.
Abstract
We analyze the performance of two different core-hole potentials in the theoretical modeling of XAS of ice, liquid and gas phase water; the use of a full core-hole (FCH) in the calculations, as suggested by Hetenyi et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 120 (18), 8632 (2004)], gives poor agreement with experiment in terms of intensity distribution as well as transition energies, while the half core hole (HCH) potential, in the case of water, provides a better compromise between initial and final state effects, leading to good agreement with the experimental data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
