Testing the External Shock Model of Gamma-Ray Bursts using the Late-Time Simultaneous Optical and X-ray Afterglows
Yuji Urata, Ryo Yamazaki, Takanori Sakamoto, Kuiyun Huang, Weikang, Zheng, Goro Sato, Tsutomu Aoki, Jinsong Deng, Kunihito Ioka, WingHuen Ip,, Koji S. Kawabata, YiHsi Lee, Xin Liping, Hiroyuki Mito, Takashi Miyata,, Yoshikazu Nakada, Takashi Ohsugi, Yulei Qiu, Takao Soyano

TL;DR
This paper tests the external shock model of gamma-ray burst afterglows by analyzing simultaneous optical and X-ray observations, finding that some events do not conform to the model's predictions during the normal decay phase.
Contribution
It provides observational evidence challenging the classical external shock model by identifying outliers in the decay index relation during the GRB afterglow phase.
Findings
4 out of 14 GRBs violate the model at >3σ level
Some afterglows do not follow the predicted decay index relation
The classical model may need modifications to explain all observations
Abstract
We study the ``normal'' decay phase of the X-ray afterglows of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), which follows the shallow decay phase, using the events simultaneously observed in the R-band. The classical external shock model -- in which neither the delayed energy injection nor time-dependency of shock micro-physics is considered -- shows that the decay indices of the X-ray and R-band light curves, and , obey a certain relation, and that in particular, should be larger than -1/4 unless the ambient density increases with the distance from the central engine. For our selected 14 samples, we have found that 4 events violate the limit at more than the 3 level, so that a fraction of events are outliers of the classical external shock model at the ``normal'' decay phase.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
