Mass Hierarchy Determination via future Atmospheric Neutrino Detectors
Raj Gandhi, Pomita Ghoshal, Srubabati Goswami, Poonam Mehta, S Uma, Sankar, Shashank Shalgar

TL;DR
This study evaluates how future atmospheric neutrino detectors can determine the neutrino mass hierarchy by analyzing survival rates and matter effects, using detailed simulations and statistical methods.
Contribution
It compares the effectiveness of water Cherenkov and magnetized iron detectors in identifying the neutrino mass hierarchy through comprehensive simulations.
Findings
Both detector types show significant sensitivity to the hierarchy.
Matter effects enhance the ability to distinguish the hierarchy.
Detector performance depends on energy and path-length measurements.
Abstract
We study the problem of determination of the sign of Delta m^2_{31}, or the neutrino mass hierarchy, through observations of atmospheric neutrinos in future detectors. We consider two proposed detector types : (a) Megaton sized water Cerenkov detectors, which can measure the survival rates of nu_\mu + \bar{\nu}_\mu and nu_e + \bar{\nu}_e and (b) 100 kton sized magnetized iron detectors, which can measure the survival rates of \nu_\mu and \bar{\nu}_\mu. For energies and path-lengths relevant to atmospheric neutrinos, these rates obtain significant matter contributions from P_{\mu e}, P_{\mu \mu} and P_{ee}, leading to an appreciable sensitivity to the hierarchy. We do a binned \chi^2 analysis of simulated data in these two types of detectors which includes the effect of smearing in neutrino energy and direction and incorporates detector efficiencies and relevant statistical,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
