Why we should teach the Bohr model and how to teach it effectively
S. B. McKagan, K. K. Perkins, and C. E. Wieman

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that an integrated curriculum with model comparison and interactive simulations effectively helps students transition from the Bohr model to the quantum Schrodinger model of the atom.
Contribution
It provides evidence that comparing multiple atomic models and using interactive tools enhances students' understanding of quantum atomic theory.
Findings
Integrated curriculum improves Schrodinger model understanding
Model comparison aids in conceptual transition
Interactive simulations support effective learning
Abstract
Some education researchers have claimed that we should not teach the Bohr model of the atom because it inhibits students' ability to learn the true quantum nature of electrons in atoms. Although the evidence for this claim is weak, many have accepted it. This claim has implications for how to present atoms in classes ranging from elementary school to graduate school. We present results from a study designed to test this claim by developing a curriculum on models of the atom, including the Bohr and Schrodinger models. We examine student descriptions of atoms on final exams in transformed modern physics classes using various versions of this curriculum. We find that if the curriculum does not include sufficient connections between different models, many students still have a Bohr-like view of atoms, rather than a more accurate Schrodinger model. However, with an improved curriculum…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
