Instability of reconstruction of the low CMB multipoles
Pavel D. Naselsky (1,2), Oleg V. Verkhodanov (3), Mikkel T.B. Nielsen, (1) ((1) Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen; (2) South Federal University,, Rostov-na-Donu, Russia; (3) Special astrophysical observatory, Nizhnij, Arkhyz, Russia)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the instability and bias in reconstructing low multipoles of the CMB using ILC maps, highlighting the challenges in debiasing and the statistical nature of cross-correlations.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the cross-correlation coefficients and demonstrates the inherent instability and uncertainties in debiasing low CMB multipoles from ILC maps.
Findings
Cross-correlation coefficients for quadrupole and octupole are around -0.52 to -0.6.
The distribution of cross-correlation coefficients follows a polynomial shape P(K,l)∝(1-K^2)^(l-1).
Debiasing of the ILC CMB is highly problematic due to statistical uncertainties and flip-effects.
Abstract
We discuss the problem of the bias of the Internal Linear Combination (ILC) CMB map and show that it is closely related to the coefficient of cross-correlation K(l) of the true CMB and the foreground for each multipole l. We present analysis of the cross-correlation for the WMAP ILC quadrupole and octupole from the first (ILC(I)) and the third (ILC(III)) year data releases and show that these correlations are about -0.52-0.6. Analysing 10^4 Monte Carlo simulations of the random Gaussian CMB signals, we show that the distribution function for the corresponding coefficient of the cross-correlation has a polynomial shape P(K,l)\propto(1-K^2)^(l-1). We show that the most probable value of the cross-correlation coefficient of the ILC and foreground quadrupole has two extrema at K ~= +/-0.58$. Thus, the ILC(III) quadrupole represents the most probable value of the coefficient K. We analyze…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
