Low-lying ud anti-s anti-s configurations in a non-relativistic constituent quark model
W.L. Wang, F. Huang, Z.Y. Zhang, Y.W. Yu, F.Liu

TL;DR
This study calculates energies of low-lying ud anti-s anti-s configurations using a non-relativistic quark model, exploring potential contributions and parameter effects, and identifies a possible tetraquark candidate near the K*K* threshold.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of ud anti-s anti-s states in a non-relativistic quark model, considering various potential contributions and parameter choices, and suggests a candidate for a tetraquark state.
Findings
The masses of all configurations are above meson-meson thresholds when using baryon-sized parameters.
Adjusting the meson size parameter can lower the J^P=1^+ state below the K*K* threshold.
The J^P=1^+ state with I=0 has a small KK^* component and weak coupling to the KK^* channel.
Abstract
The energies of the low-lying isoscalar and isovector ud anti-s anti-s configurations with spin-parity J^P=0^+, 1^+, and 2^+ are calculated in a non-relativistic constituent quark model by use of the variational method. The contributions of various parts of the quark-quark interacting potentials including the s-channel interaction are investigated, and the effect of different forms of confinement potential is examined. The model parameters are determined by the same method as in our previous work, and they still can satisfactorily describe the nucleon-nucleon scattering phase shifts and the hyperon-nucleon cross sections. The parameters of the s-channel interaction are fixed by the masses of K and K^* mesons, for which the size parameter is taken to be two possible values. When it is chosen as the same as baryons', the numerical results show that the masses of all the ud anti-s anti-s…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
