Anatomy of the binary black hole recoil: A multipolar analysis
Jeremy D. Schnittman, Alessandra Buonanno (U Maryland), James R. van, Meter, John G. Baker (NASA Goddard), William D. Boggs (U Maryland), Joan, Centrella, Bernard J. Kelly (NASA Goddard), and Sean T. McWilliams (U, Maryland)

TL;DR
This paper provides a detailed multipolar analysis of gravitational recoil in binary black hole mergers, demonstrating that a limited set of modes accurately predicts recoil velocities and explaining the underlying physics of the recoil process.
Contribution
It introduces a multipolar framework up to l=4 modes that accurately models recoil velocities and phases, linking numerical results with analytic Kerr QNM formulas.
Findings
Multipole moments up to l=4 suffice for ~2% recoil accuracy.
A few dominant modes control recoil build-up.
Analytic Kerr QNM formulas explain anti-kick and recoil differences.
Abstract
We present a multipolar analysis of the gravitational recoil computed in recent numerical simulations of binary black hole (BH) coalescence, for both unequal masses and non-zero, non-precessing spins. We show that multipole moments up to and including l=4 are sufficient to accurately reproduce the final recoil velocity (within ~2%) and that only a few dominant modes contribute significantly to it (within ~5%). We describe how the relative amplitudes, and more importantly, the relative phases, of these few modes control the way in which the recoil builds up throughout the inspiral, merger, and ringdown phases. We also find that the numerical results can be reproduced by an ``effective Newtonian'' formula for the multipole moments obtained by replacing the radial separation in the Newtonian formulae with an effective radius computed from the numerical data. Beyond the merger, the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
