Spin flip lifetimes in superconducting atom chips: BCS versus Eliashberg theory
Ulrich Hohenester, Asier Eiguren, Stefan Scheel, E. A. Hinds

TL;DR
This paper compares BCS and Eliashberg theories in predicting atomic spin-flip lifetimes near superconductors, finding Eliashberg theory provides more accurate estimates, resulting in significantly longer atomic coherence times.
Contribution
It provides a detailed theoretical comparison of BCS and Eliashberg models for spin-flip lifetimes, highlighting the importance of quasiparticle lifetime effects.
Findings
Eliashberg theory predicts longer spin lifetimes than BCS.
Atomic spin lifetime exceeds 1000 seconds at 4.2 K.
Superconductors greatly enhance atomic coherence compared to normal metals.
Abstract
We investigate theoretically the magnetic spin-flip transitions of neutral atoms trapped near a superconducting slab. Our calculations are based on a quantum-theoretical treatment of electromagnetic radiation near dielectric and metallic bodies. Specific results are given for rubidium atoms near a niobium superconductor. At the low frequencies typical of the atomic transitions, we find that BCS theory greatly overestimates coherence effects, which are much less pronounced when quasiparticle lifetime effects are included through Eliashberg theory. At 4.2 K, the typical atomic spin lifetime is found to be larger than a thousand seconds, even for atom-superconductor distances of one micrometer. This constitutes a large enhancement in comparison with normal metals.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
