Bayesian estimates of free energies from nonequilibrium work data in the presence of instrument noise
Paul Maragakis, Felix Ritort, Carlos Bustamante, Martin Karplus, Gavin, E. Crooks

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian method to accurately estimate free energy differences from nonequilibrium work data, accounting for instrument noise, and demonstrates its application to single-molecule experiments with optical tweezers.
Contribution
The paper develops a Bayesian formalism that corrects for instrument noise in free energy estimates from non-equilibrium work measurements, enhancing analysis of single-molecule experiments.
Findings
Fast, far-from-equilibrium measurements have less noise and yield more accurate free energy estimates.
The Bayesian method effectively compensates for instrument noise in experimental data.
Application to RNA hairpin experiments demonstrates improved free energy estimation.
Abstract
The Jarzynski equality and the fluctuation theorem relate equilibrium free energy differences to non-equilibrium measurements of the work. These relations extend to single-molecule experiments that have probed the finite-time thermodynamics of proteins and nucleic acids. The effects of experimental error and instrument noise have not previously been considered. Here, we present a Bayesian formalism for estimating free-energy changes from non-equilibrium work measurements that compensates for instrument noise and combines data from multiple driving protocols. We reanalyze a recent set of experiments in which a single RNA hairpin is unfolded and refolded using optical tweezers at three different rates. Interestingly, the fastest and farthest-from-equilibrium measurements contain the least instrumental noise, and therefore provide a more accurate estimate of the free energies than a few…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
