Explanation for Anomalous Shock Temperatures Measured by Neutron Resonance Spectroscopy
Damian C. Swift, Achim Seifter, David B. Holtkamp, Vincent W. Yuan,, David Bowman, David A. Clark

TL;DR
This paper investigates why neutron resonance spectrometry measures unexpectedly high shock temperatures in molybdenum, attributing discrepancies to plastic flow and projectile behavior, and provides corrections to align measurements with known material properties.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive analysis combining plastic flow calculations and projectile simulations to explain and correct anomalous shock temperature measurements in NRS.
Findings
Plastic flow accounts for 53K temperature increase.
Projectile curvature and acceleration cause 160K apparent temperature rise.
Corrected measurements align with Mo's known properties.
Abstract
Neutron resonance spectrometry (NRS) has been used to measure the temperature inside Mo samples during shock loading. The temperatures obtained were significantly higher than predicted assuming ideal hydrodynamic loading. The effect of plastic flow and non-ideal projectile behavior were assessed. Plastic flow was calculated self-consistently with the shock jump conditions: this is necessary for a rigorous estimate of the locus of shock states accessible. Plastic flow was estimated to contribute a temperature rise of 53K compared with hydrodynamic flow. Simulations were performed of the operation of the explosively-driven projectile system used to induce the shock in the Mo sample. The simulations predicted that the projectile was significantly curved on impact, and still accelerating. The resulting spatial variations in load, including radial components of velocity, were predicted to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
