The dwarf nova SS Cygni: what is wrong?
Matthias R. Schreiber, Jean-Pierre Lasota

TL;DR
This paper reevaluates the distance to SS Cygni and its implications, finding that larger distances conflict with established disc instability models, suggesting a need to revise either the models or the distance estimate.
Contribution
It provides a new analysis of SS Cygni's parameters using recent measurements, challenging the validity of the disc instability model at larger distances.
Findings
Distances greater than 140 pc conflict with the disc instability model.
The mean mass transfer rate at larger distances is comparable to nova-like systems.
Revisions are needed either in the model or in the distance estimate to SS Cygni.
Abstract
Since the Fine Guiding Sensor (FGS) on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) was used to measure the distance to SS Cyg to be pc, it became apparent that at this distance the disc instability model fails to explain the absolute magnitude during outburst. It remained, however, an open question whether the model or the distance have to be revised. Recent observations led to a revision of the system parameters of SS Cyg and seem to be consistent with a distance of pc. We re-discuss the problem taking into account the new binary and stellar parameters measured for SS Cyg. We confront not only the observations with the predictions of the disc instability model but also compare SS Cyg with other dwarf novae and nova-like systems. We assume the disc during outburst to be in a quasi stationary state and use the black-body approximation to estimate the accretion rate during…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research · Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
