Transverse momentum and pseudorapidity dependences of $'\bm{Mach-like}'$ correlations for central Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV
S. Zhang, G. L. Ma, Y. G. Ma, X. Z. Cai, J. H. Chen, H. Z. Huang, W., Q. Shen, X. H. Shi, F. Jin, J. Tian, C. Zhong, and J. X. Zuo

TL;DR
This study uses a multi-phase transport model to analyze how Mach-like shock wave correlations depend on transverse momentum and pseudorapidity in central Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV, revealing insights into jet-medium interactions.
Contribution
It provides a detailed simulation-based analysis of Mach-like correlations' dependence on kinematic variables, highlighting the role of medium properties and partonic interactions.
Findings
Splitting parameter D slightly increases with associated hadron transverse momentum.
D remains flat in mid-pseudorapidity and drops at high pseudorapidity.
Results align with experimental trends and suggest medium density effects.
Abstract
The transverse momentum and pseudorapidity dependences of partonic {`\it{Mach-like}'} shock wave have been studied by using a multi-phase transport model (AMPT) with both partonic and hadronic interactions. The splitting parameter , i.e. half distance between two splitting peaks on away side in di-hadron azimuthal angular () correlations, slightly increases with the transverse momentum of associated hadrons (), which is consistent with preliminary experimental trend, owing to different interaction-lengths/numbers between wave partons and medium in strong parton cascade. On the other hand, the splitting parameter as a function of pseudorapidity of associated hadrons (), keeps flat in mid-pseudorapidity region and rapidly drops in high-pseudorapidity region, which is as a result of different violent degrees of jet-medium interactions in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
