
TL;DR
This paper characterizes which manifolds can appear as cusp cross-sections of Hilbert modular varieties, providing a complete criterion and revealing that all Sol 3-manifolds can occur in the surface case, with some limitations in higher dimensions.
Contribution
It offers a necessary and sufficient condition for a manifold to be a cusp cross-section of a Hilbert modular variety, especially classifying Sol 3-manifolds in this context.
Findings
All Sol 3-manifolds are cusp cross-sections of Hilbert modular surfaces.
Not all Sol 3-manifolds can be cusp cross-sections of 1-cusped Hilbert modular surfaces.
Obstructions to geometric bounding are identified.
Abstract
Motivated by a question of Hirzebruch on the possible topological types of cusp cross-sections of Hilbert modular varieties, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for a manifold M to be diffeomorphic to a cusp cross-section of a Hilbert modular variety. Specialized to Hilbert modular surfaces, this proves that every Sol 3-manifold is diffeomorphic to a cusp cross-section of a (generalized) Hilbert modular surface. We also deduce an obstruction to geometric bounding in this setting. Consequently, there exist Sol 3-manifolds that cannot arise as a cusp cross-section of a 1-cusped nonsingular Hilbert modular surface.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
