The cold neutron star in the soft X-ray transient 1H 1905+000

TL;DR

This study uses deep X-ray observations to set stringent luminosity limits on the neutron star in 1H 1905+000, challenging previous claims about black hole event horizons and providing insights into neutron star properties.

Contribution

First detailed X-ray luminosity constraints on 1H 1905+000 in quiescence, questioning black hole event horizon evidence and discussing neutron star equation of state implications.

Findings

Luminosity limit lower than the faintest black hole transient in quiescence.

No optical counterpart detected down to i'>25.3, suggesting a brown or white dwarf companion.

Challenges the use of quiescent luminosity differences to infer black hole event horizons.

Abstract

We report on our analysis of 300 ks of Chandra observations of the neutron star soft X-ray transient 1H1905+000 in quiescence. We do not detect the source down to a 95% confidence unabsorbed flux upper limit of 2E-16 erg cm-2 s-1 in the 0.5-10 keV energy range for an assumed Gamma=2 power law spectral model. A limit of 1.4E-16 erg cm-2 s-1 is derived if we assume that the spectrum of 1H1905+000 in quiescence is described well with a black body of temperature of 0.2 keV. For the upper limit to the source distance of 10 kpc this yields a 0.5-10 keV luminosity limit of 2.4E30 / 1.7E30 erg/s for the abovementioned power law or black body spectrum, respectively. This luminosity limit is lower than the luminosity of A0620-00, the weakest black hole soft X-ray transient in quiescence reported so far. Together with the uncertainties in relating the mass transfer and mass accretion rates we come to the conclusion that the claim that there is evidence for the presence of a black hole event horizon on the basis of a lower quiescent luminosity for black holes than for neutron stars is unproven. We also briefly discuss the implications of the low quiescent luminosity of 1H1905+000 for the neutron star equation of state. Using deep Magellan images of the field of 1H1905+000 obtained at excellent observing conditions we do not detect the quiescent counterpart at the position of the outburst optical counterpart down to a magnitude limit of i'>25.3. This can be converted to a limit on the absolute magnitude of the counterpart of I>9.6 which implies that the counterpart can only be a brown or a white dwarf.