Source Matching in the SDSS and RASS: Which Galaxies are Really X-ray Sources?
John K. Parejko, Anca Constantin, Michael S. Vogeley (Drexel, University), and Fiona Hoyle (Widener University)

TL;DR
This study cross-matched SDSS galaxies with RASS X-ray data to identify true X-ray sources, revealing that detection rates depend on galaxy type and providing a statistical validation method for survey cross-matching.
Contribution
It introduces a statistical method to validate cross-matches between surveys with positional uncertainties, applied to SDSS and RASS data to identify genuine X-ray emitting galaxies.
Findings
No star-forming galaxies detected in RASS
Over 0.6% of narrow-line Seyferts are RASS sources
High detection rate in ambiguous optical classifications
Abstract
The current view of galaxy formation holds that all massive galaxies harbor a massive black hole at their center, but that these black holes are not always in an actively accreting phase. X-ray emission is often used to identify accreting sources, but for galaxies that are not harboring quasars (low-luminosity active galaxies), the X-ray flux may be weak, or obscured by dust. To aid in the understanding of weakly accreting black holes in the local universe, a large sample of galaxies with X-ray detections is needed. We cross-match the ROSAT All Sky Survey (RASS) with galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 4 (SDSS DR4) to create such a sample. Because of the high SDSS source density and large RASS positional errors, the cross-matched catalog is highly contaminated by random associations. We investigate the overlap of these surveys and provide a statistical test of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
