On the stabilization of ion sputtered surfaces

TL;DR

This paper explores how modifications to the classical ion sputtering model can stabilize flat surfaces at various angles, challenging previous predictions of universal instability and offering insights into pattern formation.

Contribution

It introduces alternative response functions that can stabilize surfaces, providing a new perspective on ion sputtering dynamics beyond classical Gaussian assumptions.

Findings

Certain non-Gaussian response functions stabilize flat surfaces.

Classical instability persists for Gaussian and many non-Gaussian functions.

Transition analysis offers tests for sputtering surface theories.

Abstract

The classical theory of ion beam sputtering predicts the instability of a flat surface to uniform ion irradiation at any incidence angle. We relax the assumption of the classical theory that the average surface erosion rate is determined by a Gaussian response function representing the effect of the collision cascade and consider the surface dynamics for other physically-motivated response functions. We show that although instability of flat surfaces at any beam angle results from all Gaussian and a wide class of non-Gaussian erosive response functions, there exist classes of modifications to the response that can have a dramatic effect. In contrast to the classical theory, these types of response render the flat surface linearly stable, while imperceptibly modifying the predicted sputter yield vs. incidence angle. We discuss the possibility that such corrections underlie recent reports of a ``window of stability'' of ion-bombarded surfaces at a range of beam angles for certain ion and surface types, and describe some characteristic aspects of pattern evolution near the transition from unstable to stable dynamics. We point out that careful analysis of the transition regime may provide valuable tests for the consistency of any theory of pattern formation on ion sputtered surfaces.