Matching polytopes, toric geometry, and the non-negative part of the Grassmannian
Alexander Postnikov, David Speyer, Lauren Williams

TL;DR
This paper explores the topology of the non-negative Grassmannian using toric geometry, associating polytopes and toric varieties to its cells, and proving it forms a CW complex with simple cell closures.
Contribution
It introduces a novel connection between polytopes from matchings, matroid polytopes, and toric varieties to analyze the non-negative Grassmannian's topology.
Findings
The cell decomposition of the non-negative Grassmannian is a CW complex.
The Euler characteristic of each cell's closure is 1.
Polytope face lattices are described via matchings of associated graphs.
Abstract
In this paper we use toric geometry to investigate the topology of the totally non-negative part of the Grassmannian (Gr_{kn})_{\geq 0}. This is a cell complex whose cells Delta_G can be parameterized in terms of the combinatorics of plane-bipartite graphs G. To each cell Delta_G we associate a certain polytope P(G). The polytopes P(G) are analogous to the well-known Birkhoff polytopes, and we describe their face lattices in terms of matchings and unions of matchings of G. We also demonstrate a close connection between the polytopes P(G) and matroid polytopes. We then use the data of P(G) to define an associated toric variety X_G. We use our technology to prove that the cell decomposition of (Gr_{kn})_{\geq 0} is a CW complex, and furthermore, that the Euler characteristic of the closure of each cell of (Gr_{kn})_{\geq 0} is 1.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Algebra and Geometry
