Spectral density of phase noise inter-laboratory comparison final results
Patrice Salzenstein (FEMTO-ST), Jan Cermak (IPE), Roland Barillet, (SYRTE), Frederic Lefebvre (OSA), Wolfgang Schaefer (TIMETECH), Gilles Cibiel, (CNES), G\'erard Sauvage (AEROFLEX), Olivier Franquet (AR ELECTRONIQUE),, Olivier Llopis (LAAS), Fran\c{c}ois Meyer (LAOB)

TL;DR
This paper presents the final results of an inter-laboratory comparison of phase noise measurements, focusing on evaluating uncertainties, resolution, and reproducibility across different systems to enhance trust in phase noise measurement consistency.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive evaluation of measurement uncertainties and reproducibility in phase noise comparisons across laboratories, improving traceability and confidence in measurement results.
Findings
Measurement uncertainties are quantified and analyzed.
Reproducibility of phase noise measurements is demonstrated.
Traceability between different systems is established.
Abstract
This paper reports main results of the phase noise comparison that has been performed between october 2005 and december 2006, using two oscillators at 5 and 100 MHz and un DRO at 3.5 GHz. The problem is not to compare the performances of several oscillators, but to compare and to make an evaluation of the uncertainties, and of course the resolution and the reproducibility of the measurements. This comparison allow us to determine the ability to get various systems traceable together in order to increase the trust that one can have in phase noise measurements.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Spectroscopy and Laser Applications
