Point-contact Andreev reflection spectroscopy of heavy-fermion-metal/superconductor junctions
W. K. Park, H. Stalzer, J. L. Sarrao, J. D. Thompson, L. D. Pham, Z., Fisk, J. Frederick, P. C. Canfield, L. H. Greene

TL;DR
This study investigates point-contact Andreev reflection spectroscopy on heavy-fermion metal/superconductor junctions, revealing differences from previous Au tip measurements and proposing a two-fluid model to explain the observations.
Contribution
It extends previous work by using single crystalline heavy-fermion metals with Nb tips, showing no reduction in Andreev signal and suggesting a two-fluid explanation.
Findings
Andreev signal not reduced in heavy-fermion junctions with Nb tips
No dependence of conductance on effective mass observed
Proposed two-fluid model for heavy fermions
Abstract
Our previous point-contact Andreev reflection studies of the heavy-fermion superconductor CeCoIn using Au tips have shown two clear features: reduced Andreev signal and asymmetric background conductance [1]. To explore their physical origins, we have extended our measurements to point-contact junctions between single crystalline heavy-fermion metals and superconducting Nb tips. Differential conductance spectra are taken on junctions with three heavy-fermion metals, CeCoIn, CeRhIn, and YbAl, each with different electron mass. In contrast with Au/CeCoIn junctions, Andreev signal is not reduced and no dependence on effective mass is observed. A possible explanation based on a two-fluid picture for heavy fermions is proposed. [1] W. K. Park et al., Phys. Rev. B 72 052509 (2005); W. K. Park et al., Proc. SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 5932 59321Q (2005); W. K. Park et al.,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
