TL;DR
This paper introduces a rigorous statistical framework for detecting and characterizing power-law distributions in empirical data, addressing limitations of previous methods and applying it to diverse real-world datasets.
Contribution
The authors develop a maximum-likelihood based approach combined with goodness-of-fit tests to reliably identify power-law behavior in empirical data.
Findings
Effective in distinguishing true power-law distributions from other heavy-tailed data.
Revealed that some datasets previously thought to follow power laws do not actually do so.
Provides a standardized method for analyzing power-law phenomena across disciplines.
Abstract
Power-law distributions occur in many situations of scientific interest and have significant consequences for our understanding of natural and man-made phenomena. Unfortunately, the detection and characterization of power laws is complicated by the large fluctuations that occur in the tail of the distribution -- the part of the distribution representing large but rare events -- and by the difficulty of identifying the range over which power-law behavior holds. Commonly used methods for analyzing power-law data, such as least-squares fitting, can produce substantially inaccurate estimates of parameters for power-law distributions, and even in cases where such methods return accurate answers they are still unsatisfactory because they give no indication of whether the data obey a power law at all. Here we present a principled statistical framework for discerning and quantifying power-law…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
