Measuring Dark Energy with Gamma-Ray Bursts and Other Cosmological Probes

TL;DR

This paper combines gamma-ray burst data with other cosmological probes to constrain dark energy models, reconstruct the dark energy equation-of-state, and analyze the universe's acceleration history, finding consistency with the LambdaCDM model.

Contribution

It introduces the use of a recent GRB sample combined with other probes to improve constraints on dark energy and cosmological parameters.

Findings

Constraints on cosmological parameters are tightened with combined data.

The flat Cardassian model is consistent with LambdaCDM.

Dark energy transition redshift is estimated between 0.40 and 0.65.

Abstract

It has been widely shown that the cosmological parameters and dark energy can be constrained by using data from type-Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy, the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) peak from Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), the X-ray gas mass fraction in clusters, and the linear growth rate of perturbations at z=0.15 as obtained from the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey. Recently, gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have also been argued to be promising standard candles for cosmography. In this paper, we present constraints on the cosmological parameters and dark energy by combining a recent GRB sample including 69 events with the other cosmological probes. First, we find that for the LambdaCDM cosmology this combination makes the constraints stringent and the best fit is close to the flat universe. Second, we fit the flat Cardassian expansion model and find that this model is consistent with the LambdaCDM cosmology. Third, we present constraints on several two-parameter dark energy models and find that these models are also consistent with the LambdaCDM cosmology. Finally, we reconstruct the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w(z) and the deceleration parameter q(z). We see that the acceleration could have started at a redshift from z_T=0.40_{-0.08}^{+0.14} to z_T=0.65_{-0.05}^{+0.10}. This difference in the transition redshift is due to different dark energy models that we adopt. The most stringent constraint on w(z) lies in the redshift range z\sim 0.3-0.6.