A multi band study of the optically dark GRB 051028
Yuji Urata, Kui-Yun Huang, Ping-Hung Kuo, Wing-Huen Ip, Yulei Qiu,, Keisuke Masuno, Makoto Tashiro, Keichi Abe, Kaori Onda, Natsuki Kodaka,, Makoto Kuwahara, Toru Tamagawa, Fumihiko Usui, Kunihito Ioka, Yi-Hsi Lee,, Jianyan Wei, Jinsong Deng, Weikang Zheng, and Kazuo Makishima

TL;DR
This study observes the optical afterglow of GRB 051028, finding it optically faint but not due to dust or high redshift, suggesting intrinsic darkness of the afterglow.
Contribution
It provides detailed optical observations of GRB 051028 and analyzes reasons for its darkness, challenging previous explanations involving dust extinction or high redshift.
Findings
Optical afterglow shows a possible plateau around 0.1 days.
Brightness is 3 magnitudes fainter than a known dark GRB.
Spectral analysis indicates no significant host galaxy absorption.
Abstract
Observations were made of the optical afterglow of GRB 051028 with the Lulin observatory's 1.0 m telescope and the WIDGET robotic telescope system. R band photometric data points were obtained on 2005 October 28 (UT), or 0.095-0.180 days after the burst. There is a possible plateau in the optical light curve around 0.1 days after the burst; the light curve resembles optically bright afterglows (e.g. GRB 041006, GRB 050319, GRB060605) in shape of the light curve but not in brightness. The brightness of the GRB 051028 afterglow is 3 magnitudes fainter than that of one of the dark events, GRB 020124. Optically dark GRBs have been attributed to dust extinction within the host galaxy or high redshift. However, the spectrum analysis of the X-rays implies that there is no significant absorption by the host galaxy. Furthermore, according to the model theoretical calculation of the Ly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
