Nitrogen Production in Starburst Galaxies Detected by GALEX
Ryan P. Mallery, Lisa Kewley, R. Michael Rich, Samir Salim, Stephane, Charlot, Christy Tremonti, Mark Seibert, Todd Small, Ted Wyder, Tom A., Barlow, Karl Forster, Peter G. Friedman, D. Christopher Martin, Patrick, Morrissey, Susan G. Neff, David Schiminovich, Luciana Bianchi

TL;DR
This study analyzes nitrogen production in starburst galaxies using UV data from GALEX and spectroscopic data from SDSS, revealing differences in nitrogen-to-oxygen ratios related to star formation activity.
Contribution
It combines UV and optical data to derive gas-phase abundances and star formation histories, providing new insights into nitrogen production in starburst galaxies.
Findings
Galaxies with higher specific star formation rates have lower N/O ratios.
The study compares multiple diagnostics for oxygen abundance.
Starburst activity influences nitrogen enrichment in galaxies.
Abstract
We investigate the production of nitrogen in star forming galaxies with ultraviolet (UV) radiation detected by the Galaxy Evolution Explorer Satellite (GALEX). We use a sample of 8,745 GALEX emission line galaxies matched to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) spectroscopic sample. We derive both gas-phase oxygen and nitrogen abundances for the sample, and apply stellar population synthesis models to derive stellar masses and star formation histories of the galaxies. We compare oxygen abundances derived using three different diagnostics. We derive the specific star formation rates of the galaxies by modeling the 7-band GALEX+SDSS photometry. We find that galaxies that have log SFR/M > -10.0 typically have values of log N/O ~0.05 dex less than galaxies with log SFR/M < -10.0 and similar oxygen abundances.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
