(An)isotropy of the Hubble diagram: comparing hemispheres
Dominik J. Schwarz, Bastian Weinhorst

TL;DR
This study tests the isotropy of the Hubble diagram using supernova data, revealing significant hemispheric anisotropy at low redshifts, likely due to systematic errors rather than fundamental cosmological anisotropy.
Contribution
It provides the first hemispheric comparison of the Hubble diagram at small redshifts, highlighting potential systematic biases in supernova observations affecting cosmological conclusions.
Findings
Significant anisotropy detected at z < 0.2 with > 95% confidence.
Hemispheric asymmetry aligns with equatorial frame, suggesting systematic errors.
Data does not conclusively support accelerated expansion in all hemispheres.
Abstract
We test the isotropy of the Hubble diagram. At small redshifts, this is possible without assumptions on the cosmic inventory and provides a fundamental test of the cosmological principle. At higher redshift we check for the self-consistency of the LambdaCDM model. At small redshifts, we use public supernovae (SNe) Ia data to determine the deceleration parameter q_0 and the SN calibration on opposite hemispheres. For the complete data sets we fit Omega_M and the SN calibration on opposite hemispheres. A statistically significant anisotropy of the Hubble diagram at redshifts z < 0.2 is discovered (> 95% C.L.). While data from the North Galactic hemisphere favour the accelerated expansion of the Universe, data from the South Galactic hemisphere are not conclusive. The hemispheric asymmetry is maximal toward a direction close to the equatorial poles. The discrepancy between the equatorial…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
