The discovery of a massive supercluster at z=0.9 in the UKIDSS DXS
A.M. Swinbank (ICC, Durham), A. Edge (ICC), I. Smail (ICC), J. Stott, (ICC), M. Bremer (Bristol), Y. Sato (NAO, Japan), C. van Breukelen (Oxford),, M. Jarvis (Oxford), I. Waddington (Sussex), L. Clewley (Oxford), J. Bergeron, (IAP), G. Cotter (Sussex), S. Dye (Cardiff)

TL;DR
This paper reports the discovery of a massive supercluster at redshift 0.9 in the UKIDSS DXS survey, confirmed through spectroscopic follow-up, and compares its properties to known superclusters at lower redshifts.
Contribution
First identification and spectroscopic confirmation of a supercluster at z=0.9 in the UKIDSS DXS survey, revealing its similarity to lower-redshift superclusters.
Findings
Confirmed five galaxy over-densities at z=0.89
Detected an additional over-density at z=1.09
Supercluster properties resemble those of Shapley and Hercules superclusters
Abstract
We analyse the first publicly released deep field of the UKIDSS Deep eXtragalactic Survey (DXS) to identify candidate galaxy over-densities at z~1 across ~1 sq. degree in the ELAIS-N1 field. Using I-K, J-K and K-3.6um colours we identify and spectroscopically follow-up five candidate structures with Gemini/GMOS and confirm they are all true over-densities with between five and nineteen members each. Surprisingly, all five structures lie in a narrow redshift range at z=0.89+/-0.01, although they are spread across 30Mpc on the sky. We also find a more distant over-density at z=1.09 in one of the spectroscopic survey regions. These five over-dense regions lying in a narrow redshift range indicate the presence of a supercluster in this field and by comparing with mock cluster catalogs from N-body simulations we discuss the likely properties of this structure. Overall, we show that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
