Structural distortions and model Hamiltonian parameters: from LSDA to a tight-binding description of LaMnO_3
Claude Ederer, Chungwei Lin, and Andrew J. Millis

TL;DR
This paper evaluates a two-band tight-binding model for LaMnO_3 by comparing it with detailed LSDA calculations, analyzing the effects of distortions and magnetic order, and determining model parameters from first-principles data.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive validation and parameterization of a TB model for LaMnO_3 based on LSDA calculations, including effects of distortions and magnetic configurations.
Findings
Hopping amplitudes are independent of magnetic order and JT distortions.
Both JT distortions and Hund's coupling are essential for an insulating ground state.
GdFeO_3-type rotations reduce hopping amplitudes without invalidating the TB model.
Abstract
The physics of manganites is often described within an effective two-band tight-binding (TB) model for the Mn e_g electrons, which apart from the kinetic energy includes also a local "Hund's rule" coupling to the t_{2g} core spin and a local coupling to the Jahn-Teller (JT) distortion of the oxygen octahedra. We test the validity of this model by comparing the energy dispersion calculated for the TB model with the full Kohn-Sham band-structure calculated within the local spin-density approximation (LSDA) to density functional theory. We analyze the effect of magnetic order, JT distortions, and "GdFeO_3-type" tilt-rotations of the oxygen octahedra. We show that the hopping amplitudes are independent of magnetic order and JT distortions, and that both effects can be described with a consistent set of model parameters if hopping between both nearest and next-nearest neighbors is taken into…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
