On the k-Symplectic, k-Cosymplectic and Multisymplectic Formalisms of Classical Field Theories
Narciso Roman-Roy, Angel M. Rey, Modesto Salgado, Silvia Vilarino

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationships between k-symplectic, k-cosymplectic, and multisymplectic formalisms in classical field theories, establishing equivalences and clarifying geometric aspects of solutions.
Contribution
It demonstrates the equivalence between k-symplectic and autonomous k-cosymplectic formalisms and clarifies the geometric nature of solutions in these frameworks.
Findings
Proves the equivalence between k-symplectic and autonomous k-cosymplectic theories.
Establishes the relation between k-cosymplectic and certain multisymplectic theories.
Clarifies the geometric interpretation of Hamilton-de Donder-Weyl and Euler-Lagrange solutions.
Abstract
The objective of this work is twofold: First, we analyze the relation between the k-cosymplectic and the k-symplectic Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formalisms in classical field theories. In particular, we prove the equivalence between k-symplectic field theories and the so-called autonomous k-cosymplectic field theories, extending in this way the description of the symplectic formalism of autonomous systems as a particular case of the cosymplectic formalism in non-autonomous mechanics. Furthermore, we clarify some aspects of the geometric character of the solutions to the Hamilton-de Donder-Weyl and the Euler-Lagrange equations in these formalisms. Second, we study the equivalence between k-cosymplectic and a particular kind of multisymplectic Hamiltonian and Lagrangian field theories (those where the configuration bundle of the theory is trivial).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
