Ten Year Review of Queue Scheduling of the Hobby-Eberly Telescope
Matthew Shetrone, Mark E. Cornell, James R. Fowler, Niall Gaffney,, Benjamin Laws, Jeff Mader, Cloud Mason, Stephen Odewahn, Brian Roman, Sergey, Rostopchin, Donald P. Schneider, James Umbarger, and Amy Westfall

TL;DR
This paper reviews a decade of queue scheduling at the Hobby-Eberly Telescope, highlighting operational strategies, challenges, and improvements that maximize scientific output and adaptability to variable conditions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of the HET queue scheduling system, including its methodology, strengths, and areas for improvement based on ten years of operational experience.
Findings
Effective handling of multiple scientific programs
Flexibility in scheduling enhances scientific productivity
Continuous improvements have optimized telescope utilization
Abstract
This paper presents a summary of the first 10 years of operating the Hobby-Eberly Telescope (HET) in queue mode. The scheduling can be quite complex but has worked effectively for obtaining the most science possible with this uniquely designed telescope. The queue must handle dozens of separate scientific programs, the involvement of a number of institutions with individual Telescope Allocation Committees as well as engineering and instrument commissioning. We have continuously revised our queue operations as we have learned from experience. The flexibility of the queue and the simultaneous availability of three instruments, along with a staff trained for all aspects of telescope and instrumentation operation, have allowed optimum use to be made of variable weather conditions and have proven to be especially effective at accommodating targets of opportunity and engineering tasks. In…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
