The Infrared Ca II triplet as metallicity indicator
Ricardo Carrera (1), Carme Gallart (1), Elena Pancino (2), Robert Zinn, (3) ((1)Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, Spain, (2) Osservatorio, Astronomico di Bologna, Italy, (3) Deparment of Astronomy, Yale University,, USA)

TL;DR
This study analyzes the infrared Ca II triplet lines in nearly 500 RGB stars across various clusters to establish their effectiveness as metallicity indicators, considering age and luminosity effects.
Contribution
It provides the first empirical analysis of Ca II triplet behavior across a wide range of ages and metallicities, including the impact of age and different metallicity scales.
Findings
Ca II triplet strength varies with luminosity and metallicity.
Linear relations hold in specific magnitude intervals and certain metallicity scales.
Age has a weak influence on the Ca II triplet-metallicity relationship.
Abstract
From observations of almost 500 RGB stars in 29 Galactic open and globular clusters, we have investigated the behaviour of the infrared Ca II triplet (8498, 8542 and 8662 \AA) in the age range 13Age/Gyr0.25 and the metallicity range [Fe/H] +0.47. These are the widest ranges of ages and metallicities in which the behaviour of the Ca II triplet lines has been investigated in a homogeneous way. We report the first empirical study of the variation of the CaII triplet lines strength, for given metallicities, with respect to luminosity. We find that the sequence defined by each cluster in the Luminosity-Ca plane is not exactly linear. However, when only stars in a small magnitude interval are observed, the sequences can be considered as linear. We have studied the the Ca II triplet lines on three metallicities scales. While a linear correlation between the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
