Multiwavelength study of massive galaxies at z~2. I. Star formation and galaxy growth
E. Daddi, M. Dickinson, G. Morrison, R. Chary, A. Cimatti, D. Elbaz,, D. Frayer, A. Renzini, A. Pope, D.M. Alexander, F.E. Bauer, M. Giavalisco, M., Huynh, J. Kurk, M. Mignoli

TL;DR
This study investigates star formation and galaxy growth in massive galaxies at z~2 using multiwavelength data, revealing high star formation rates, the prevalence of ULIRGs, and discrepancies with current galaxy formation models.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive multiwavelength analysis of massive galaxies at z~2, highlighting the role of ULIRGs and challenging existing galaxy formation models.
Findings
20-30% of massive galaxies show mid-IR excess due to obscured AGN
SFR correlates linearly with stellar mass for 24um-detected galaxies
ULIRGs at z=2 are long-lived and common in massive galaxy star formation
Abstract
Examining a sample of massive galaxies at 1.4<z<2.5 with K_{Vega}<22 from the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey, we compare photometry from Spitzer at mid- and far-IR, to submillimeter, radio and rest-frame ultraviolet wavelengths, to test the agreement between different tracers of star formation rates (SFRs) and to explore the implications for galaxy assembly. For z~2 galaxies with moderate luminosities(L_{8um}<10^{11}L_sun), we find that the SFR can be estimated consistently from the multiwavelength data based on local luminosity correlations. However,20--30% of massive galaxies, and nearly all those with L_{8um}>10^{11}L_sun, show a mid-IR excess which is likely due to the presence of obscured active nuclei, as shown in a companion paper. There is a tight and roughly linear correlation between stellar mass and SFR for 24um-detected galaxies. For a given mass, the SFR at z=2 was…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
