Electromagnetic response of high-Tc superconductors -- the slave-boson and doped-carrier theories
Tiago C. Ribeiro, Xiao-Gang Wen

TL;DR
This paper compares slave-boson and doped-carrier theories for high-Tc superconductors, analyzing doping effects on quasiparticle current and superfluid density, and predicts experimental signatures to distinguish these theories.
Contribution
It provides a detailed doping-dependent analysis of quasiparticle current and superfluid density in two slave-particle theories, highlighting differences and experimental signatures.
Findings
In slave-boson theory, the quasiparticle current renormalization factor $oldsymbol{eta}$ weakly depends on doping.
Doped-carrier theory aligns better with experimental data and explains hole-electron asymmetry.
Predicted STM signature of local staggered spin correlations in underdoped high-Tc compounds.
Abstract
We evaluate the doping dependence of the quasiparticle current and low temperature superfluid density in two slave-particle theories of the tt't''J model -- the slave-boson theory and doped-carrier theory. In the slave-boson theory, the nodal quasiparticle current renormalization factor vanishes proportionally to the zero temperature superfluid density ; however, we find that away from the limit displays a much weaker doping dependence than . A similar conclusion applies to the doped-carrier theory, which differentiates the nodal and antinodal regions of momentum space. Due to its momentum space anisotropy, the doped-carrier theory enhances the value of in the hole doped regime, bringing it to quantitative agreement with experiments, and reproduces the asymmetry between hole and electron doped cuprate superconductors.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
