Comment on "note on the derivative of the hyperbolic cotangent"
Ilki Kim

TL;DR
This paper refutes previous claims that the derivative of hyperbolic cotangent includes an additional delta function term, reaffirming the standard derivative expression.
Contribution
It provides a rigorous argument demonstrating that the standard derivative of hyperbolic cotangent is complete without additional delta function terms.
Findings
Standard derivative of coth y is correct as -csch^2 y
Previous claims of an extra delta function term are incorrect
Reaffirms established mathematical results
Abstract
In a couple of articles (Ford G W and O'Connell R F 1996 Nature 380 113 and 2002 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 4183) it was argued that the standard result for the derivative of the hyperbolic cotangent in the literature, d \coth y/dy = -{csch}^2 y is incomplete and the correct expression should have an additional term proportional to the Dirac delta function. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that this claim is incorrect.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Differential Geometry Research · Mathematics and Applications · Algebraic and Geometric Analysis
