The Black Hole Mass - Spheroid Luminosity relation

TL;DR

This study refines the black hole mass–spheroid luminosity relation by addressing previous inconsistencies, resulting in a unified, accurate relation with implications for galaxy evolution and black hole growth.

Contribution

The paper provides a corrected, consistent K-band M_bh-Luminosity relation by addressing previous issues and applying uniform regression analysis, improving the understanding of black hole and galaxy coevolution.

Findings

Optimal K-band relation: log(M_bh/M_sun) = -0.37(M_K+24) + 8.29

Total scatter in log M_bh is 0.33 dex, comparable to other relations

Consistent B- and R-band relations are also derived

Abstract

The differing M_bh-Luminosity relations presented in McLure & Dunlop, Marconi & Hunt and Erwin et al. have been investigated. A number of issues have been identified and addressed in each of these studies, including but not limited to: the removal of a dependency on the Hubble constant; a correction for dust attenuation in the bulges of disc galaxies; the identification of lenticular galaxies previously treated as elliptical galaxies; and application of the same (Y|X) regression analysis. These adjustments result in relations which now predict similar black hole masses. The optimal K-band relation is log(M_bh/M_sun) = -0.37(+/-0.04)[M_K +24] + 8.29(+/-0.08), with a total (not intrinsic) scatter in log M_bh equal to 0.33 dex. This level of scatter is similar to the value of 0.34 dex from the M_bh-sigma relation of Tremaine et al. and compares favourably with the value of 0.31 dex from the M_bh-n relation of Graham & Driver. Using different photometric data, consistent relations in the B- and R-band are also provided, although we do note that the small (N=13) R-band sample used by Erwin et al. is found here to have a slope of -0.30(+/-0.06) and a total scatter of 0.31 dex. Performing a symmetrical regression on the larger K-band sample gives a slope of -0.40, implying M_bh ~ L^{1.00}. Implications for galaxy-black hole coevolution, in terms of dry mergers, are briefly discussed, as are predictions for intermediate mass black holes. Finally, as previously noted by Tundo et al., a potential bias in the galaxy sample used to define the M_bh-L relations is shown and a corrective formula provided.