On sensing capacity of sensor networks for the class of linear observation, fixed SNR models

TL;DR

This paper derives information-theoretic bounds on the sensing capacity of sensor networks for sparse signals in fixed SNR conditions, highlighting the impact of sparsity and sensing diversity on the number of sensors needed.

Contribution

It provides the first information-theoretic bounds on sensing capacity for sparse signals, including the effects of sensing diversity and coverage strategies.

Findings

Sensing capacity decreases as sparsity increases.

Random sampling outperforms contiguous sampling in coverage.

Sensing capacity approaches zero as sparsity approaches zero.

Abstract

In this paper we address the problem of finding the sensing capacity of sensor networks for a class of linear observation models and a fixed SNR regime. Sensing capacity is defined as the maximum number of signal dimensions reliably identified per sensor observation. In this context sparsity of the phenomena is a key feature that determines sensing capacity. Precluding the SNR of the environment the effect of sparsity on the number of measurements required for accurate reconstruction of a sparse phenomena has been widely dealt with under compressed sensing. Nevertheless the development there was motivated from an algorithmic perspective. In this paper our aim is to derive these bounds in an information theoretic set-up and thus provide algorithm independent conditions for reliable reconstruction of sparse signals. In this direction we first generalize the Fano's inequality and provide lower bounds to the probability of error in reconstruction subject to an arbitrary distortion criteria. Using these lower bounds to the probability of error, we derive upper bounds to sensing capacity and show that for fixed SNR regime sensing capacity goes down to zero as sparsity goes down to zero. This means that disproportionately more sensors are required to monitor very sparse events. Our next main contribution is that we show the effect of sensing diversity on sensing capacity, an effect that has not been considered before. Sensing diversity is related to the effective \emph{coverage} of a sensor with respect to the field. In this direction we show the following results (a) Sensing capacity goes down as sensing diversity per sensor goes down; (b) Random sampling (coverage) of the field by sensors is better than contiguous location sampling (coverage).