Bone Cancer Rates in Dinosaurs Compared with Modern Vertebrates
L.C. Natarajan, A.L. Melott, B.M. Rothschild, and L.D. Martin, (University of Kansas)

TL;DR
This study compares bone cancer rates in dinosaurs with modern vertebrates using radiological data, finding no significant difference, and thus does not support ionizing radiation as a factor in the K-T extinction.
Contribution
It provides a statistical comparison of bone cancer prevalence between dinosaurs and modern vertebrates, addressing a potential link to extinction causes.
Findings
No significant difference in bone cancer rates
Ionizing radiation unlikely to be a cause of K-T extinction
Supports similar cancer susceptibility across species
Abstract
Data on the prevalence of bone cancer in dinosaurs is available from past radiological examination of preserved bones. We statistically test this data for consistency with rates extrapolated from information on bone cancer in modern vertebrates, and find that there is no evidence of a different rate. Thus, this test provides no support for a possible role of ionizing radiation in the K-T extinction event.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
