# White dwarf masses derived from planetary nebulae modelling

**Authors:** K. Gesicki, A.A. Zijlstra

arXiv: 0704.0620 · 2009-11-13

## TL;DR

This study compares the mass distributions of planetary nebulae central stars and white dwarfs, revealing differences that suggest variations in evolutionary speeds and potential observational biases.

## Contribution

It introduces a dynamical method for measuring stellar masses with high precision and compares the resulting distributions to explore stellar evolution.

## Key findings

- CSPN mass distribution peaks at 0.61 M_sun
- WD mass distribution peaks at 0.58 M_sun and is broader
- Some WD may skip the PN phase due to low mass

## Abstract

We compare the mass distribution of central stars of planetary nebulae (CSPN) with those of their progeny, white dwarfs (WD). We use a dynamical method to measure masses with an uncertainty of 0.02 M$_\odot$. The CSPN mass distribution is sharply peaked at $0.61 \rm M_\odot$. The WD distribution peaks at lower masses ($0.58 \rm M_\odot$) and shows a much broader range of masses. Some of the difference can be explained if the early post-AGB evolution is faster than predicted by the Bl\"ocker tracks. Between 30 and 50 per cent of WD may avoid the PN phase because of too low mass. However, the discrepancy cannot be fully resolved and WD mass distributions may have been broadened by observational or model uncertainties.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/0704.0620/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/0704.0620/full.md

## References

17 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/0704.0620/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/0704.0620