On the KK-theory of strongly self-absorbing C*-algebras
Marius Dadarlat, Wilhelm Winter

TL;DR
This paper explores the KK-theory of strongly self-absorbing C*-algebras, establishing asymptotic unitary equivalence of certain homomorphisms, describing automorphism spaces, and relating KK-groups to K-theory.
Contribution
It proves that unital endomorphisms of strongly self-absorbing C*-algebras are asymptotically inner and characterizes their automorphism spaces and KK-theory in new ways.
Findings
Unital endomorphisms are asymptotically inner.
Automorphism spaces are compactly-contractible.
KK(, A) is isomorphic to K_0(A).
Abstract
Let and be unital and separable -algebras; let be strongly self-absorbing. It is known that any two unital -homomorphisms from to are approximately unitarily equivalent. We show that, if is also -injective, they are even asymptotically unitarily equivalent. This in particular implies that any unital endomorphism of is asymptotically inner. Moreover, the space of automorphisms of is compactly-contractible (in the point-norm topology) in the sense that for any compact Hausdorff space , the set of homotopy classes reduces to a point. The respective statement holds for the space of unital endomorphisms of . As an application, we give a description of the Kasparov group in terms of -homomorphisms and asymptotic unitary equivalence. Along the way, we show that the Kasparov…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Operator Algebra Research · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Holomorphic and Operator Theory
On the -theory of strongly self-absorbing -algebras
Marius Dadarlat
Department of Mathematics, Purdue University, West Lafayette,
IN 47907, USA
and
Wilhelm Winter
Mathematisches Institut der Universität Münster
Einsteinstr. 62
D-48149 Münster, Germany
Abstract.
Let and be unital and separable -algebras; let be strongly self-absorbing. It is known that any two unital ∗-homomorphisms from to are approximately unitarily equivalent. We show that, if is also -injective, they are even asymptotically unitarily equivalent. This in particular implies that any unital endomorphism of is asymptotically inner. Moreover, the space of automorphisms of is compactly-contractible (in the point-norm topology) in the sense that for any compact Hausdorff space , the set of homotopy classes reduces to a point. The respective statement holds for the space of unital endomorphisms of . As an application, we give a description of the Kasparov group in terms of ∗-homomorphisms and asymptotic unitary equivalence. Along the way, we show that the Kasparov group is isomorphic to .
Key words and phrases:
Strongly self-absorbing -algebras, -theory, asymptotic unitary equivalence, continuous fields of -algebras
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:
46L05, 47L40
Supported by: The first named author was partially supported by NSF grant #DMS-0500693.
The second named author was supported by the DFG (SFB 478).
0. Introduction
A unital and separable -algebra is strongly self-absorbing if there is an isomorphism which is approximately unitarily equivalent to the inclusion map , ([14]). Strongly self-absorbing -algebras are known to be simple and nuclear; moreover, they are either purely infinite or stably finite. The only known examples of strongly self-absorbing -algebras are the UHF algebras of infinite type (i.e., every prime number that occurs in the respective supernatural number occurs with infinite multiplicity), the Cuntz algebras and , the Jiang–Su algebra and tensor products of with UHF algebras of infinite type, see [14]. All these examples are -injective, i.e., the canonical map is injective.
It was observed in [14] that any two unital ∗-homomorphisms are approximately unitarily equivalent, were is another unital and separable -algebra. If is -injective, the unitaries implementing the equivalence may even be chosen to be homotopic to the unit. When is , , it was known that and are even asymptotically unitarily equivalent – i.e., they can be intertwined by a continuous path of unitaries, parametrized by a half-open interval. Up to this point, it was not clear whether the respective statement holds for the Jiang–Su algebra . Theorem 2 below provides an affirmative answer to this problem. Even more, we show that the path intertwining and may be chosen in the component of the unit.
We believe this result, albeit technical, is interesting in its own right, and that it will be a useful ingredient for the systematic further use of strongly self-absorbing -algebras in Elliott’s program to classify nuclear -algebras by -theory data. In fact, this point of view is our main motivation for the study of strongly self-absorbing -algebras; see [8], [10], [16], [17], [18] and [15] for already existing results in this direction.
For the time being, we use Theorem 2 to derive some consequences for the Kasparov groups of the form . More precisely, we show that all the elements of the Kasparov group are of the form where is a ∗-homomorphism and is the inclusion and . Moreover, two non-zero ∗-homomorphisms with have the same KK-theory class if and only if there is a unitary-valued continuous map , such that and for all . In addition, we show that , .
One may note the similarity to the descriptions of ([8],[10]) and . However, we do not require that satisfies the universal coefficient theorem (UCT) in KK-theory. In the same spirit, we characterize and the universal UHF algebra using -theoretic conditions, but without involving the UCT.
As another application of Theorem 2 (and the results of [7]), we prove in [4] an automatic trivialization result for continuous fields with strongly self-absorbing fibres over finite dimensional spaces.
The second named author would like to thank Eberhard Kirchberg for an inspiring conversation on the problem of proving Theorem 2.
1. Strongly self-absorbing -algebras
In this section we recall the notion of strongly self-absorbing -algebras and some facts from [14].
1.1 Definition: * Let , be -algebras and be ∗-homomorphisms. Suppose that is unital.*
- (i)
We say that and are approximately unitarily equivalent, , if there is a sequence of unitaries in such that
[TABLE]
for every . If all can be chosen to be in , the connected component of of the unitary group , then we say that and are strongly approximately unitarily equivalent, written . 2. (ii)
We say that and are asymptotically unitarily equivalent, , if there is a norm-continuous path of unitaries in such that
[TABLE]
for every . If one can arrange that and hence (* for all ), then we say that and are strongly asymptotically unitarily equivalent, written .*
1.2 The concept of strongly self-absorbing -algebras was formally introduced in [14, Definition 1.3]:
Definition: *
A separable unital -algebra is strongly self-absorbing, if and there is an isomorphism such that . *
1.3 Recall [14, Corollary 1.12]:
Proposition: * Let and be unital -algebras, with strongly self-absorbing. Then, any two unital ∗-homomorphisms are approximately unitarily equivalent. In particular, any two unital endomorphisms of are approximately unitarily equivalent. *
We note that the assumption that is separable which appears in the original statement of [14, Corollary 1.12] is not necessary and was not used in the proof.
1.4 Lemma: * Let be a strongly self-absorbing -algebra. Then there is a sequence of unitaries in the commutator subgroup of such that for all as . *
Proof: Let be a finite normalized set and let . By [14, Prop. 1.5] there is a unitary such that for all . Let be a ∗-isomorphism. Then for all . By Proposition 1 and so there is a unitary such that and hence . Setting we deduce that for all .
1.5 Remark: In the situation of Proposition 1, suppose that the commutator subgroup of is contained in . This will happen for instance if is assumed to be -injective. Then one may choose the unitaries which implement the approximate unitary equivalence between and to lie in . This follows from [14, (the proof of) Corollary 1.12], since the unitaries are essentially images of the unitaries of Lemma 1 under suitable unital ∗-homomorphisms.
2. Asymptotic vs. approximate unitary equivalence
It is the aim of this section to establish a continuous version of Proposition 1.
2.1 Lemma: * Let be separable unital strongly self-absorbing -algebra. For any finite subset and , there are a finite subset and such that the following holds:*
If is another unital -algebra and is a unital ∗-homomorphism, and if is a unitary satisfying
[TABLE]
for all , then there is a continuous path of unitaries in such that , and
[TABLE]
*for all , . *
Proof: We may clearly assume that the elements of are normalized and that . Let be a unitary satisfying
[TABLE]
for all . There exist and elements of norm at most one such that
[TABLE]
Set
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Now let be a unitary as in the assertion of the lemma, i.e., satisfies
[TABLE]
for all . We proceed to construct the path .
By [14, Remark 2.7] there is a unital ∗-homomorphism
[TABLE]
such that
[TABLE]
for all .
Since , there is a path of unitaries in such that
[TABLE]
For define
[TABLE]
then is a continuous path of unitaries in . For and we have
[TABLE]
where for the last equality we have used that the are unitaries and that is a unital ∗-homomorphism. Furthermore, we have
[TABLE]
The above estimate allows us to extend the path to the whole interval in the desired way: We have , whence is not in the spectrum of . By functional calculus, there is with such that . For we may therefore define a continuous path of unitaries
[TABLE]
It is clear that and as , whence is a continuous path of unitaries in satisfying and . Moreover, it is easy to see that
[TABLE]
for all , whence
[TABLE]
for , .
We have now constructed a path with the desired properties.
2.2 Theorem: * Let and be unital -algebras, with separable, strongly self-absorbing and -injective. Then, any two unital ∗-homomorphisms are strongly asymptotically unitarily equivalent. In particular, any two unital endomorphisms of are strongly asymptotically unitarily equivalent. *
Proof: Note that the second statement follows from the first one with , since by assumption.
Let be a unital -algebra such that and let be unital ∗-homomorphisms. We shall prove that and are strongly asymptotically unitarily equivalent. Choose an increasing sequence
[TABLE]
of finite subsets of such that is a dense subset of . Let be a decreasing sequence of strictly positive numbers converging to [math].
For each , employ Lemma 2 (with and in place of and ) to obtain a finite subset and . We may clearly assume that
[TABLE]
for all .
Since and are strongly approximately unitarily equivalent by Proposition 1 and Remark 1, there is a sequence of unitaries such that
[TABLE]
for all and . Let us set
[TABLE]
Then and
[TABLE]
for , . Now by Lemma 2 (and the choice of the and ), for each there is a continuous path of unitaries in such that , and
[TABLE]
for all , .
Next, define a path of unitaries in by
[TABLE]
We have that
[TABLE]
and that
[TABLE]
as from below, which implies that the path is continuous in . Furthermore, for and we obtain
[TABLE]
Since the are nested and the converge to [math], we have
[TABLE]
for all ; by continuity and since is dense in , we have (14) for all . Since we may arrange that .
3. The group and some applications
3.1 For a separable -algebra we endow the group of automorphisms with the point-norm topology.
Corollary: * Let be a separable, unital, strongly self-absorbing and -injective -algebra. Then reduces to a point for any compact Hausdorff space . *
Proof: Let be continuous maps. We identify and with unital ∗-homomorphisms . By Theorem 2, is strongly asymptotically unitarily equivalent to . This gives a homotopy between the two maps .
3.2 Remark: The conclusion of Corollary 3 was known before for a UHF algebra of infinite type and a CW complex by [13], for by [8] and [10], and for by [2]. It is new for the Jiang–Su algebra.
3.3 For unital -algebras and we denote by the set of homotopy classes of unital ∗-homomorphisms from to . By a similar argument as above we also have the following corollary.
Corollary: * Let and be unital -algebras. If is separable, strongly self-absorbing and -injective, then reduces to a singleton. *
3.4 For separable unital -algebras and , let , be the morphism of groups induced by the unital inclusion .
Theorem: * Let be a unital, separable and strongly self-absorbing -algebra. Then for any separable -algebra , the map is bijective, for . In particular both groups are countable and discrete with respect to their natural topology. *
Proof: Since is KK-equivalent to , we may assume that is purely infinite and in particular -injective by [11, Prop. 4.1.4]. Let denote the mapping cone -algebra of . By [3, Cor. 3.10], there is a bijection and hence for all separable and unital -algebras as a consequence of Corollary 3. Since is isomorphic to by Bott periodicity and the latter group injects in , we have that for all unital and separable -algebras and . Since is a subgroup of (where is the unitization of ) we see that for all separable -algebras . Using the Puppe exact sequence, where ,
[TABLE]
we conclude that is an isomorphism, . The map is continuous since it is given by the Kasparov product with a fixed element (we refer the reader to [12], [9] or [1] for a background on the topology of the Kasparov groups). Since the topology of is discrete and is injective, it follows that the topology of is also discrete. The countability of follows from that of , as is separable.
3.5 Remark: In contrast to Theorem 3, if is the universal UHF algebra, then has the power of the continuum [6, p. 221].
3.6 Let and be as in Theorem 3 and assume in addition that is -injective and is unital. Let be defined by .
Corollary: * If is a projection, and are two unital ∗-homomorphisms, then and hence . Moreover:*
[TABLE]
Proof: Let , and be as in the first part of the statement. By [14, Cor. 3.1], the unital -algebra is -stable, being a hereditary subalgebra of a -stable -algebra. Therefore by Theorem 2.
Now for the second part of the statement, let be an arbitrary element. Then for some projection and . Since is -stable, there is a unital ∗-homomorphism . Then
[TABLE]
and hence since is injective by Theorem 3.
In the remainder of the paper we give characterizations for the Cuntz algebra and for the universal UHF-algebra which do not require the UCT. The latter result is a variation of a theorem of Effros and Rosenberg [5].
3.7 Proposition: * Let be a separable unital strongly self-absorbing -algebra. If in , then . *
Proof: Since must be nuclear (see [14]), embeds unitally in by Kirchberg’s theorem. is not stably finite since . By the dichotomy of [14, Thm. 1.7] must be purely infinite. Since in , there is a unital embedding , see [11, Prop. 4.2.3]. We conclude that is isomorphic to by [14, Prop. 5.12].
3.8 Proposition: * Let , be separable, unital, strongly self-absorbing -algebras. Suppose that for any finite subset of and any there is a u.c.p. map such that for all . Then . *
Proof: By [14, Thm. 2.2] it suffices to show that for any given finite subsets of , of and any there is u.c.p. map such that (i) for all and (ii) for all and . We may assume that for all . Since is strongly self-absorbing, by [14, Prop. 1.10] there is a unital ∗-homomorphism such that for all . On the other hand, by assumption there is a u.c.p. map such that for all . Let us define a u.c.p. map by . It is clear that satisfies (i) since is a ∗-homomorphism. To conclude the proof we check now that also satisfies (ii). Let and . Then
[TABLE]
3.9 Proposition: * Let be a separable, unital, strongly self-absorbing -algebra. Suppose that is quasidiagonal, it has cancellation of projections and that for all . Then is isomorphic to the universal UHF algebra with . *
Proof: Since is separable unital and quasidiagonal, there is a unital ∗-representation on a separable Hilbert space and a sequence of nonzero projections of finite rank such that for all . Then the sequence of u.c.p. maps is asymptotically multiplicative, i.e for all . Therefore by Proposition 3.
In the second part of the proof we show that . Let be a conditional expectation onto . Then for all .
By assumption, for each there is a projection in (for some ) such that in . Let be defined by . Since has cancellation of projections and since , there is a partial isometry such that and . Therefore gives a unital embedding of into . Finally, defines a sequence of asymptotically multiplicative u.c.p. maps . Therefore by Proposition 3.
3.10 Remark: Let be a separable, unital, strongly self-absorbing and quasidiagonal -algebra. Then by the first part of the proof of Proposition 3. In particular and by the Künneth formula (or by writing as an inductive limit of matrices).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] M. Dadarlat. On the topology of the Kasparov groups and its applications. , J. Funct. Anal. 228 (2005), 394–418.
- 2[2] M. Dadarlat. Continuous fields of C ∗ superscript 𝐶 C^{*} -algebras over finite dimensional spaces , ar Xiv preprint math.OA/0611405 (2006).
- 3[3] M. Dadarlat. The homotopy groups of the automorphism group of Kirchberg algebras , J. Noncomm. Geom. 1 (2007), 113–139.
- 4[4] M. Dadarlat and W. Winter. Trivialization of 𝒞 ( X ) 𝒞 𝑋 {\mathcal{C}}(X) -algebras with strongly self-absorbing fibres , preprint (2007).
- 5[5] E. G. Effros and J. Rosenberg. C ∗ superscript 𝐶 ∗ C^{\ast} -algebras with approximately inner flip , Pacific J. Math. 77 (1978), 417–443.
- 6[6] L. Fuchs. Infinite abelian groups , vol. 1, Academic Press, New York and London, 1970.
- 7[7] I. Hirshberg, M. Rørdam and W. Winter. 𝒞 0 ( X ) subscript 𝒞 0 𝑋 {\mathcal{C}}_{0}(X) -algebras, stability and strongly self-absorbing C ∗ superscript 𝐶 C^{*} -algebras , ar Xiv preprint math.OA/0610344 (2006). To appear in Math. Ann.
- 8[8] E. Kirchberg. The classification of purely infinite C ∗ superscript 𝐶 C^{*} -algebras using Kasparov’s theory , preprint (1994).
