Duality and Tameness
Marc Chardin, Steven Dale Cutkosky, Juergen Herzog, Hema Srinivasan

TL;DR
This paper establishes a duality theorem for specific graded algebras and explores various examples demonstrating the failure of tameness in local cohomology, highlighting the nuanced behavior of these algebraic structures.
Contribution
It introduces a duality theorem for graded algebras and provides examples illustrating the failure of tameness in local cohomology.
Findings
Duality theorem for certain graded algebras
Examples of failure of tameness in local cohomology
Insights into the behavior of local cohomology in algebraic structures
Abstract
We prove a duality theorem for certain graded algebras and show by various examples different kinds of failure of tameness of local cohomology.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Duality and Tameness
Marc Chardin, Steven Dale Cutkosky, Jürgen Herzog and Hema Srinivasan
Marc Chardin, Institut Mathématique de Jussieu Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Boite 247, 4, place Jussieu, F-75252 PARIS CEDEX 05
Dale Cutkosky, Mathematics Department, 202 Mathematical Sciences Bldg, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
Jürgen Herzog, Fachbereich Mathematik und Informatik, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Campus Essen, 45117 Essen, Germany
Hema Srinivasan, Mathematics Department, 202 Mathematical Sciences Bldg, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[email protected] ¡[email protected]¿
Abstract.
We prove a duality theorem for certain graded algebras and show by various examples different kinds of failure of tameness of local cohomology.
The second author was partially supported by NSF
Introduction
The purpose of this paper is to construct examples of strange behavior of local cohomology. In these constructions we follow a strategy that was already used in [CH] and which relates, via a spectral sequence introduced in [HR], the local cohomology for the two distinguished bigraded prime ideals in a standard bigraded algebra.
In the first part we consider algebras with rather general gradings and deduce a similar spectral sequence in this more general situation. A typical example of such an algebra is the Rees algebra of a graded ideal. The proof for the spectral sequence given here is simpler than that of the corresponding spectral sequence in [HR].
In the second part of this paper we construct examples of standard graded rings , which are algebras over a field , such that the function
[TABLE]
is an interesting function for . In our examples, this dimension will be finite for all .
Suppose that is a Noetherian local ring, is a standard graded ring and set . Let be a finitely generated graded -module and be the sheafification of on . We then have graded -module isomorphisms
[TABLE]
for , and a similar expression for and .
By Serre vanishing, for all and . However, the asymptotic behaviour of for is much more mysterious.
In the case when is a field, the function (1) is in fact a polynomial for large enough . The proof is a consequence of graded local duality ([BS, 13.4.6] or [BH, 3.6.19]) or follows from Serre duality on a projective variety.
For more general , are finitely generated modules, but need not have finite length.
The following problem was proposed by Brodmann and Hellus [BrHe].
Tameness problem: Are the local cohomology modules tame? That is, is it true that either
[TABLE]
The problem has a positive solution for of small dimension (some of the references are Brodmann [Br], Brodmann and Hellus [BrHe], Lim [L], Rotthaus and Sega [RS]).
Theorem 0.1** ([BrHe]).**
If , then is tame.
However, it has recently been shown by two of the authors that tameness can fail if .
Theorem 0.2** ([CH]).**
There are examples with where is not tame.
The statement of this example is reproduced in Theorem 3.1 of this paper. The function (1) is periodic for large . Specifically, the function (1) is 2 for large even and is 0 for large odd .
In Theorem 3.3 we construct an example of failure of tameness of local cohomology which is not periodic, and is not even a quasi polynomial (in ) for large . Specifically, we have for ,
[TABLE]
where the characteristic of is . We have for all odd .
We also give an example (Theorem 3.5) of failure of tameness where (1) is a quasi polynomial with linear growth in even degree and is 0 in odd degree.
In Theorem 3.6, we give a tame example, but we have
[TABLE]
so (1) is far from being a quasi polynomial in for large .
While the example of [CH] is for , where is the canonical module of , the examples of the paper are all for . This allows us to easily reinterpret our examples as Rees algebras in Section 4, and thus we have examples of Rees algebras over local rings for which the above failure of tameness holds.
In the final section, Section 5, we give an analysis of the explicit and implicit role of bigraded duality in the construction of the examples, and some comments on how it effects the geometry of the constructions.
1. Duality for polynomial rings in two sets of variables
Let be any commutative ring (with unit). In later applications will be mostly a field. Furthermore let , and .
The homology of the Čech complex (resp. ) will be denoted by (resp. ). Notice that for any commutative ring , this homology is the local cohomology supported in (resp. ), as and are generated by a regular sequences.
Assume that is -graded for some abelian group , and that for . If , with and .
Definition 1.1**.**
Let be a -graded ideal. The -grading of is -sharp if is a finitely generated -module, for every and .**
Lemma 1.2**.**
The following conditions are equivalent:
- (i)
the -grading of is -sharp. 2. (ii)
the -grading of is -sharp. 3. (iii)
for all , .
Note that if is Noetherian, is a finitely generated -graded -module, and the -grading of is -sharp, then is a finite -module, for every and . This follows from the converging -graded spectral sequence , where is a -graded free -resolution of with finite for every .
We will assume from now on that the -grading of is -sharp (equivalently -sharp). Set , and if is a -graded module, then let and where the -grading of is given by . More generally, we always denote the graded -dual of a graded module (over what graded -algebra soever) by . Finally we denote by the map induced by multiplication by where and . Then
Lemma 1.3**.**
**
Proof.
The free -module is generated by the elements with and , and is generated by the elements with and .
Let be the -linear map defined by
[TABLE]
Then is an isomorphism (because the -grading of is -sharp) and there is a commutative diagram
[TABLE]
The assertion follows.
As an immediate consequence we obtain
Corollary 1.4**.**
(a)* Let be an homogeneous element of degree , and the graded degree zero map induced by multiplication with . Then*
[TABLE]
(b)* Let be a -graded complex of finitely generated free -modules. Then*
- (i)
* for and for ,* 2. (ii)
.
As the main result of this section we have
Theorem 1.5**.**
Assume that is Noetherian, the -grading of is -sharp (equivalently -sharp) and is a finitely generated -graded -module. Set . Let be a minimal -graded -resolution of . Then,
- (a)
For all , there is a functorial isomorphism
[TABLE] 2. (b)
There is a convergent -graded spectral sequence,
[TABLE]
In particular, if is a field, there is a convergent -graded spectral sequence,
[TABLE]
Proof.
Claim (a) is an immediate consequence of Corollary 1.4 via the -graded spectral sequence . For (b), the two spectral sequences arising from the double complex have as second terms respectively , for and . If further is a field, .
Corollary 1.6**.**
Under the hypotheses of the theorem, if is a field, then for any , there are convergent spectral sequences of finite dimensional -vector spaces
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
We now consider the special case that , with and with . Set and let be a -graded -module. We view as a -graded module by defining . Observe that each itself is a graded -module with for all . We also note that , as can been seen from the definition of local cohomology using the Čech complex. Here is the graded maximal ideal of .
Corollary 1.7**.**
With the notation introduced, let and . Then
- (a)
* for any ,* 2. (b)
there is an exact sequence
[TABLE] 3. (c)
Let . If is annihilated by a power of for all , then there is an exact sequence
[TABLE]
In particular, if has finite length for all , for some integer , then
[TABLE]
Consequently, if is a generalized Cohen-Macaulay module (i.e. has finite length for all ), and if we set , then
[TABLE]
Proof.
(a), (b) and (c) are direct consequences of Corollary 1.6. For the application, notice that if with one has for all . Therefore, for such , the desired conclusion follows.
A typical example to which this situation applies is the Rees algebra of a graded ideal in the standard graded polynomial ring . Say, is generated be the homogeneous polynomials with for . Then the Rees algebra is generated the elements . If we set for all and for all , then becomes a -graded -module via the -algebra homomorphism with and .
According to this definition we have for all .
Since , the module is the canonical module of (in the sense of [HK, 5. Vortrag]). Recall that if a ring is a finite -module of dimension , the natural finite map is an isomorphism if and only if is . Thus in combination with Corollary 1.7 we obtain
Corollary 1.8**.**
Let . Suppose that is Cohen-Macaulay for all where and . Then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Since localizes, the conditions imply that is Cohen-Macaulay for all . Hence the natural into map has a cokernel of finite length. In particular, for . Thus Corollary 1.7 applied to gives the desired conclusion.
Remark 1.9**.**
Let . If the cokernel of is annihilated by a power of (in other words, the blow-up is , as a projective scheme over ), then for and therefore one has an exact sequence
[TABLE]
for such a .**
2. A method of constructing examples
Suppose that is a standard bigraded algebra over a ring . Define and . Define ideals and in . Suppose that is a finitely generated, bigraded -module. Define and . is a graded -module and is a graded -module. Let , so that . Let so that . We have module isomorphisms
[TABLE]
for . Let be the sheafification of the graded -module on . We have module isomorphisms
[TABLE]
for and exact sequences
[TABLE]
We have similar formulas for the calculation of .
Now assume that is a projective scheme over and and are very ample line bundles on . Let
[TABLE]
We require that be a standard bigraded -algebra. We have
[TABLE]
The sheafification of the graded -module on is , and the sheafification of the graded -module on is (Exercise II.5.9 [Ha]).
For we have bigraded isomorphisms
[TABLE]
Viewing as a graded algebra, we thus have graded isomorphisms
[TABLE]
for and . Let .
We now further assume that is an algebraically closed field and is a nonsingular variety. Let
[TABLE]
a projective space bundle over with projection . Since is an ample bundle on , is ample on . Since
[TABLE]
with
[TABLE]
and is generated in degree 1 with respect to this grading, is very ample on and is the homogeneous coordinate ring of the nonsingular projective variety , so that is generalized Cohen Macaulay (all local cohomology modules of with respect to the maximal bigraded ideal of have finite length for ). We further have that is projectively normal by this embedding (Exercise II.5.14 [Ha]) so that is normal.
3. Strange behavior of local cohomology
In [CH], we constructed the following example of failure of tameness of local cohomology. In the example, has dimension 3, which is the lowest possible for failure of tameness [Br].
Theorem 3.1**.**
Suppose that is an algebraically closed field. Then there exists a normal standard graded -algebra with , and a normal standard graded -algebra with such that for ,
[TABLE]
where is the canonical module of , .
We first show that the above theorem is also true for the local cohomology of .
Theorem 3.2**.**
Suppose that is an algebraically closed field. Then there exists a normal standard graded -algebra with , and a normal standard graded -algebra with such that for ,
[TABLE]
where .
Proof.
We compute this directly for the of Theorem 3.1 from (2) and the calculations of [CH]. Translating from the notation of this paper to the notation of [CH], we have is an Abelian surface, and .
By (2) of this paper, for , we have
[TABLE]
Formula (1) of [CH] tells us that for ,
[TABLE]
Thus for , we have
[TABLE]
giving the conclusions of the theorem.
The following example shows non periodic failure of tameness.
Theorem 3.3**.**
Suppose that is a prime number such that and . Then there exists a normal standard graded -algebra over a field of characteristic with , and a normal standard graded -algebra with such that for ,
[TABLE]
where . We have for all odd .
To establish this, we need the following simple lemma.
Lemma 3.4**.**
Suppose that is a non singular curve of genus g over an algebraically closed field , and , are line bundles on . If and , then the natural map
[TABLE]
is a surjection.
Proof.
If is a line bundle on , then if and is very ample if (Chapter IV, Section 3 [Ha]).
Suppose that is very ample and is another line bundle on . If , then is 2-regular for (Lecture 14, [M1]). Thus if , then
[TABLE]
is a surjection by Castelnuovo’s Proposition, Lecture 14, page 99 [M1].
We now apply the above to prove the lemma. Write where is a line bundle such that , and . . Thus there exists a surjection
[TABLE]
We iterate to get surjections
[TABLE]
for , and a surjection
[TABLE]
We now prove Theorem 3.3. For the construction, we start with an example from Section 6 of [CS]. There exists an algebraically closed field of characteristic , a curve of genus 2 over , a point and a line bundle on of degree 0, such that for ,
[TABLE]
Further, for all .
Let . Let be an elliptic curve over , and let , with projections . Let be a point and let . Let , with projections , . Let . Let
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
For , we have
[TABLE]
by the Künneth formula (IV of Lecture 11 [M1]) and Lemma 3.4.
Let . is a standard bigraded -algebra by (4). Thus (2) holds.
By the Riemann Roch Theorem, we compute,
[TABLE]
and for ,
[TABLE]
We further have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
By (2), for , we have
[TABLE]
By the Künneth formula,
[TABLE]
Thus by (5) - (8), we have for ,
[TABLE]
and we have the conclusions of Theorem 3.3.
Theorem 3.5 gives an example of failure of tameness of local cohomology with larger growth.
Theorem 3.5**.**
Suppose that is an algebraically closed field. Then there exists a normal standard graded -algebra over with , and a normal standard graded -algebra with such that for ,
[TABLE]
where .
Proof.
Let be an elliptic curve over , and let be a point. Let . By Proposition IV.4.6 [Ha], is very ample on , and
[TABLE]
is generated in degree 1 as a -algebra. For ,
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Let , with the three canonical projections . Define
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Let
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
By (9) and the Künneth formula, is standard bigraded. By (2), the fact that and Serre duality,
[TABLE]
for .
Now by (10), (11) and the Künneth formula, we have that for ,
[TABLE]
Thus the conclusions of Theorem 3.5 hold.
The following theorem gives an example of tame, but still rather strange local cohomology. Let be the greatest integer in a real number .
Theorem 3.6**.**
Suppose that is an algebraically closed field. Then there exists a normal standard graded -algebra with , and a normal standard graded -algebra with such that for ,
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where .
Proof.
We use the method of Example 1.6 [Cu]. Let be an elliptic curve over an algebraically closed field , and let be a point. Let with projections . Let , and
[TABLE]
be the diagonal of . We compute (as in [Cu]) that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
If is an ample line bundle on , then
[TABLE]
by the vanishing theorem of Section 16 [M2].
Suppose that is a very ample line bundle on , and is a numerically effective (nef) line bundle. Then is 3 regular for , so that
[TABLE]
is a surjection if . is an ample divisor by the Moishezon Nakai criterion (Theorem V.1.10 [Ha]), so that is very ample by Lefschetz’s theorem (Theorem, Section 17 [M2]). Let
[TABLE]
Then is 3 regular for , so we have surjections
[TABLE]
for all .
is ample by the Moishezon Nakai criterion. Let . is very ample by Lefschetz’s theorem, and thus is very ample. Let
[TABLE]
is 3 regular for , so we have surjections
[TABLE]
for all .
for and , we have
[TABLE]
Since is nef, it is 3 regular for , and we have a surjection for all , ,
[TABLE]
Let
[TABLE]
We have shown that is a standard bigraded -algebra. Thus (2) holds.
For , let . As in Example 1.6 [Cu], and by (14) and Serre Duality ( since is an Abelian variety), we deduce that
and imply is ample and . 2. 2.
implies . 3. 3.
and imply is ample and .
Let and .
Using (12) and (13), we compute
[TABLE]
We have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Since , for and , we have
if and only if and 2. 2.
if and only if 3. 3.
if and only if and .
By the Riemann Roch Theorem for an Abelian surface (Section 16 [M2]),
[TABLE]
Thus for and ,
[TABLE]
For , let . By (2),
[TABLE]
For , we have
[TABLE]
Setting , we have
[TABLE]
We thus have the conclusions of the theorem.
4. Strange examples of Rees Algebras
Let notation and assumptions be as in Section 2. Since is ample, there exists such that . Thus we have an embedding . Let , which we have embedded as an ideal sheaf of . For and , let
[TABLE]
For , let and . Let . as graded rings over , although they have different bigraded structures. Thus for all we have
[TABLE]
is a homogeneous ideal of , and is the Rees algebra of . Thus all of the examples of Section 3 can be interpreted as Rees algebras over normal rings with isolated singularities.
We thus obtain the following theorems from Theorems 3.2 - 3.6. Theorems 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 give examples of Rees algebras with non tame local cohomology.
Theorem 4.1**.**
Suppose that is an algebraically closed field. Then there exists a normal, standard graded algebra with and a graded ideal such that the Rees algebra of is normal, and for ,
[TABLE]
where is the graded ideal of .
Theorem 4.2**.**
Suppose that is a prime number such that and . Then there exists a normal standard graded -algebra over a field of characteristic with , and a graded ideal such that the Rees algebra of is normal, and for ,
[TABLE]
where is the graded ideal of . We have for all odd .
Theorem 4.3**.**
Suppose that is an algebraically closed field. Then there exists a normal, standard graded -algebra with and a graded ideal such that the Rees algebra of is normal, and for ,
[TABLE]
where is the graded ideal of .
Theorem 4.4**.**
Suppose that is an algebraically closed field. Then there exists a normal standard graded algebra with , and a graded ideal such that the Rees algebra of is normal, and for ,
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where is the graded ideal of .
By localizing at the graded maximal ideal of , we obtain examples of Rees algebras of local rings with strange local cohomology.
In all of these examples, is generalized Cohen Macaulay, but is not Cohen Macaulay. This follows since in all of these examples,
[TABLE]
5. Local duality in the examples
The example of [CH], giving failure of tameness of local cohomology, is stated in Theorem 3.1 of this paper. The proof of [CH] uses the bigraded local duality theorem of [HR], which now follows from the much more general bigraded local duality theorem, Theorem 1.5 and Corollary 1.7 of this paper, to conclude that in our situation, where is generalized Cohen Macaulay,
[TABLE]
for .
In [CH], the formula
[TABLE]
for and is then used with formula (1) of [CH] ((3) of this paper) to prove Theorem 3.1.
In Section 2 we derive (2) from which we directly compute the local cohomology in the examples of this paper. We make essential use of Serre duality on in computing the examples.
In this section, we show how (16) can be obtained directly from the geometry of and , and how this formula can be directly interpreted as Serre duality on .
Let notation be as in Section 2, so that is an algebraically closed field, and are very ample line bundles on the nonsingular variety .
Let be the dualizing module of , and let be the canonical bundle of (which is a dualizing sheaf on ). For a module , let .
Lemma 5.1**.**
We have that
[TABLE]
Set , a graded module. The sheafification of on is
[TABLE]
Set , a graded module. The sheafification of on is
[TABLE]
Proof.
Give the grading where the elements of degree in are .
We have realized (with this grading) as the coordinate ring of the projective embedding of by the very ample divisor , with projection .
Let be the canonical line bundle on . We first calculate . Let be a fiber of the map . By adjunction, we have that . Since
[TABLE]
we see that there exists a line bundle on such that
[TABLE]
The natural split exact sequence
[TABLE]
determines a section of , such that of the exact sequence
[TABLE]
is (20) (Proposition II.7.12 [Ha]). Thus
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
By adjunction, we have that the canonical line bundle of is
[TABLE]
Putting the above together, we see that
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
We realize as a bigraded quotient of a bigraded polynomial ring
[TABLE]
with for all and for all . Viewing as a graded -algebra with the grading determined by for all , we have a projective embedding . Since is nonsingular, we see from Section III.7 of [Ha] that
[TABLE]
where is the dimension of , and . is defined as
[TABLE]
For ,
[TABLE]
(by Proposition III.6.9 [Ha]). Thus and
[TABLE]
are isomorphic in high degree. Since both modules have depth at the maximal bigraded ideal of , we see that
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
Since a fiber of satisfies if , we see that (with this grading) if and For , we have
[TABLE]
The conclusions of the lemma now follow.
Suppose that . Since and are ample, and , there exists a natural number such that
[TABLE]
for and all .
By (18), we have graded isomorphisms
[TABLE]
for .
By Serre duality,
[TABLE]
By (21), there exists such that
[TABLE]
for .
Now apply the functor on graded -modules, with the grading
[TABLE]
to (24), and compare with (17), to obtain
[TABLE]
for , from which (16) immediately follows.
We can now verify that Theorem 3.1 is in fact true for all , using (22) and (3).
We finally comment that an alternate proof of Theorem 3.2 for is obtained from Theorem 3.1, Formulas (2) and (22), the fact that is an Abelian variety so that , and the observation that
[TABLE]
for .
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[A] Aoyama, On the depth and the projective dimension of the canonical module , Japan J. Math. 6 (1980), 61–69.
- 2[Br He] Brodmann, M. and Hellus, M., Cohomological patterns of coherent sheaves over projective schemes , J. Pure and Appl. Alg. 172 (2002), 165–182.
- 3[Br] Brodmann, M., Asymptotic behaviour of cohomology: tameness, supports and associated primes, Joint International Meeting of the American Mathematical Society and the Indian Mathematical Society on Commutative Algebra and Algebraic Geometry , Bangalore/India, December 17-20, 2003, Contemporary Mathematics 390 (2005), 31-61.
- 4[BS] Brodmann, M. and Sharp, R., Local cohomology, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, (1998).
- 5[BH] Bruns, W. and Herzog, J., Cohen-Macaulay rings (Revised edition) , Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 39 , Cambridge University Press, 1998.
- 6[Cu] Cutkosky, S.D., Zariski decomposition of divisors on algebraic varieties , Duke Math. J. 53 (1986), 149 -156.
- 7[CH] Cutkosky, S.D. and Herzog, J., Failure of tameness of Local Cohomology , to appear in Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra.
- 8[CS] Cutkosky, S.D. and Srinivas, V., On a problem of Zariski on dimensions of linear systems , Annals of Math. 137 (1993), 531 - 559.
